Skip to content

What Should Hospitals Look for in Shared Workstation Authentication?

Hospitals evaluating shared workstation authentication should ask whether a solution verifies identity after login and not just at the start, whether it requires a phone or badge clinicians can't always carry, whether it works with existing applications, whether it preserves individual accountability, and whether the response to a mismatch is controlled by the hospital's own policy.

Questions Worth Asking Before You Buy

  • Does the solution verify identity after login? A solution that only verifies identity at the beginning of a session leaves a gap when users leave workstations or move between devices.
  • Does it work without requiring a phone? Phones may not be practical or permitted in every hospital environment.
  • Does it require physical badges or tokens? Physical authentication devices can improve convenience in some environments but also introduce operational and management requirements.
  • Does it work with existing applications? Authentication should be evaluated in the context of the applications employees actually use, including clinical systems, productivity applications, virtual desktops, and other enterprise software.
  • Does it preserve individual accountability? Shared workstations should not result in shared identity. Organizations need to know which individual is associated with activity performed through an authenticated session.
  • What happens when the user's identity changes? A hospital should understand what the system does when it detects that the person using the workstation may no longer match the authenticated identity.
  • Can the response be controlled by organizational policy? Different environments have different risk tolerances, and the system should support the hospital's own security policy rather than impose a single response everywhere.

Why These Questions, Specifically

Hospitals evaluating authentication for shared workstations should look beyond the initial login experience. A tool that stops at authentication leaves the exact gap that makes shared workstations risky in the first place: it can prove who logged in, but not who is still there. The strongest answers to the questions above tend to point in the same direction, toward a system that verifies identity continuously, works without extra hardware, integrates with what clinicians already use, and lets the hospital, not the vendor, decide what happens on a mismatch.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should hospitals consider when choosing shared workstation authentication?

Hospitals should consider security, workflow, individual accountability, application compatibility, user interaction, deployment requirements, and what happens when the authenticated user's identity or trust state changes during a session.

Is this checklist different for pharmacy, imaging, or registration than for nursing units?

The questions are the same across departments. Shared workstations show up in pharmacy, imaging, laboratory, and registration just as often as at the nursing station, and the same evaluation criteria apply wherever staff rotate through one terminal.

More from the Blog

July 16, 2025

Why Clinical Identity in Hospitals Is So Hard — and How Continuous Authentication Solves It

In Healthcare, Identity Is a Clinical Problem—Not Just a Security One In hospital environments, authentication is...
July 23, 2025

Continuous Authentication: Keeping Clinicians Focused on Patients, Not Passwords

In hospitals, clinicians are under constant pressure—not just from patient loads or administrative tasks, but from the...
April 11, 2022

BREAKING: What You Need to Know About PCI DSS 4.0

In 2006, the Payment Card Industry Security Standard Council (PCI SSC) launched a set of requirements to ensure that...

Subscribe Here

We will never share your email address with third parties.